Skip to main content

Table of Contents

Introduction

The midface region plays a crucial role in youthful facial contours and overall aesthetic balance. Volume loss in this area due to aging can lead to nasolabial folds, tear trough depressions, and sagging cheeks. Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), a biostimulatory injectable, offers a regenerative approach by stimulating collagen production over time rather than simply filling volume with immediate effect. This article presents clinical insights from a case series evaluating the efficacy, safety, and aesthetic outcomes of PLLA injections for midface volumization.

Clinical Overview

PLLA has emerged as a reliable option in facial rejuvenation protocols, particularly in patients seeking gradual, natural-looking results. Unlike traditional fillers that provide immediate volumization, PLLA induces fibroblast activation and neocollagenesis, resulting in progressive volume enhancement. The case series under review included adult female patients aged 35 to 55 years presenting with age-related midfacial volume depletion.

All patients underwent two sessions of PLLA injection, spaced 6 to 8 weeks apart. The protocol included reconstitution of PLLA 48 hours before injection and use of a fanning technique with cannulae to ensure even product distribution across the malar and submalar regions.

Clinical Results and Study Insights

According to the 2023 clinical study published in the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, all patients showed a statistically significant improvement in midface volume scores based on the Midface Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS). The most prominent volumizing effects were observed between 3 and 6 months post-treatment, aligning with the expected collagen biostimulation timeline of PLLA. At the 12-month follow-up, most patients retained a noticeable improvement in cheek projection and midface contour.

Patient-reported satisfaction was high, with 90% of participants stating they would recommend PLLA for midface rejuvenation. Only minimal side effects were reported—mainly transient swelling and mild bruising—resolving within 3 to 5 days.

Technique Considerations

The study emphasized that the success of PLLA in midface restoration relies on proper patient selection, reconstitution timing, and injection technique. Key technical recommendations included:

  • Use of a 22G or 25G cannula to minimize vascular trauma
  • Deep subcutaneous or supraperiosteal placement for optimal scaffold support
  • Avoiding bolus injection near the nasolabial or infraorbital areas to reduce nodule formation risk

Pre- and post-injection massage protocols were also followed to ensure even product distribution and reduce the risk of granulomas.

Conclusions

This case series supports the safety and long-term efficacy of PLLA in restoring midface volume with natural, progressive results. The findings reinforce PLLA’s value as a biostimulatory alternative for patients unwilling to commit to more invasive procedures or synthetic fillers. With proper technique and patient education, PLLA injections in the midface can lead to high satisfaction and durable aesthetic outcomes.

 

e-BIOSTIMULATORS Team